The police responded: What are the hidden dangers of "sharing the bed" in the circle of friends?

On the 21st, reporters learned from the Beijing police that the public security agency has been investigating the recent phenomenon of "shared sleeping pods." The investigation revealed potential security risks, particularly concerning safety and fire regulations. Relevant parties were subsequently interviewed. According to reports, the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau expressed significant concern over whether this emerging business complies with relevant laws and regulations, falls within the scope of police oversight, and poses any safety hazards. As a result, they proactively initiated an investigation and verification process. This particular sleeping pod is operated by Beijing One Technology Co., Ltd., which is registered in Chaoyang District, Beijing. Their primary business focus includes scientific and technological development and technical services. Currently, there are numerous sleeping pods placed across various locations in the city. The specific sleeping pod mentioned in the article is located on the second basement floor of a shopping complex in Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District. Each pod measures approximately 2.1 meters in length, 0.9 meters in width, and around 0.9 meters in height. Users can access these pods by simply registering and scanning a QR code on their phones, without needing to provide identification details. These sleeping pods operate on a timed-rest service model, providing rest and relaxation. According to Article 2 of the "Beijing Hotel Industry Public Security Administration Regulations," this type of establishment qualifies as part of the hotel industry and thus must apply for a special trade license from the local public security authorities. Operating without permission is prohibited. Furthermore, under laws like the Fire Protection Law, these sleeping pods fall under the hotel industry umbrella and must undergo corresponding firefighting administrative approval or filing procedures while adhering to fire safety technical standards. During the investigation, it was discovered that these pods could be used without requiring identity registration, making them susceptible to misuse by individuals engaging in illegal activities. The enclosed design and confined interior space pose serious risks in the event of a fire, creating potential law and order issues. Following the investigation, the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau's Public Security Administration met with the responsible party of the company operating the sleeping pods. Legal requirements were explained, and it was communicated that all necessary statutory formalities must be fulfilled. Failure to do so could result in legal consequences. The company representative expressed gratitude for the guidance provided by the police and assured compliance with all legal obligations. Currently, the company has ceased operations at 16 locations within the city and is proceeding with the dismantling and removal of the sleeping pods. A representative from the Beijing police stated that the capital's public security organs have consistently acted in accordance with the law, ensuring the protection of "public entrepreneurship and innovation." Regarding emerging industries, the police remain committed to performing their regulatory duties legally, conducting thorough hazard assessments, promoting legal policies, guiding lawful enterprise operations, and fostering their healthy growth while prioritizing safety. The suspension of "shared sleeping pods" has occurred more than once. Why is this network sensation gaining attention? Imagine enjoying private sleeping space at an affordable price without needing to register with your ID—just scan a QR code. Recently, the "shared sleeping cabins" appearing in cities like Beijing and Shanghai have caught public interest. However, shortly after launching, this novel idea faced suspension. Initially not hot, but quick to withdraw The use of "shared sleeping cabins" has been temporarily halted. In recent days, places like Beijing, Shanghai, and Sichuan have seen the emergence of "shared sleep" concepts. These pods require no deposit, additional charges, or ID registration. Simply scan a QR code to gain entry, with rates starting as low as 6.5 hours... Their simple operational model and affordability have drawn considerable attention. However, this concept of "shared sleep" has failed to attract widespread adoption and quickly faced suspension. Behind the "shared sleep" concept lies insufficient supervision. For the emergence of this new "shared sleep" concept, opinions are divided. Supporters generally agree that these sleeping pods are easy to use and affordable, meeting the needs of many office workers. Opponents, however, argue that the health and safety risks associated with these pods are significant. Professor Su Peng of the Law School at the University of International Business and Economics and Director of the Consumer Protection Law Research Center stated in an interview that unlike bike-sharing, the introduction of "shared sleep modules" has sparked much debate due to differences in industry classification. "Although operators emphasize that these pods are intended solely for internal staff use and are not available 24/7, they are still offered for public rest and are profit-driven market activities. From an economic perspective, these should be considered part of the hotel industry and managed accordingly." He emphasized that the operation of "shared sleep modules" involves numerous management aspects, including fire safety, sanitation, and law enforcement. Without proper oversight by relevant departments, this constitutes a violation of business administration regulations. Professor Zhu Xi, a professor at the China University of Political Science and Law and an expert member of the China Internet Association Economic Work Committee, similarly believes that in China, hotels, guesthouses, and similar establishments require approval from multiple departments, including those related to business, sanitation, and firefighting. Today's "shared sleeping cabins," lacking these qualifications, pose significant risks. These pods must acquire the necessary offline hotel credentials to ensure user health and safety before going live. During the "sharing economy" boom, what else can people share? The experience of "shared sleeping cabins" has also prompted reflection on whether the products that have rapidly proliferated under the "sharing economy" truly belong to the sharing economy or merely exploit the term. In the opinion of Su Tongren, "sharing economy" is not an official statutory or policy concept. "From a broad perspective, as long as a commodity or service is used by an unspecified number of people, it can be termed a 'sharing economy.'" He believes that the current "shared sleeping modules" and shared bicycles essentially follow the same model and can be categorized under the broader "sharing economy," representing a new economic form. Yet, not everything is suited to "sharing." This type of "shared sleep," which involves direct bodily contact, raises concerns regarding safety and hygiene, making its rationality worth questioning. Zhu Dajian, Director of the Institute of Sustainable Development and Management at Tongji University, also holds that sharing is "trendy" now, but not every kind of "sharing" has stable and enduring demand. Not every "share" represents innovation or requires testing by the market and society. In his view, from sharing among acquaintances to achieving stranger-to-stranger sharing through mobile payments, the essence of the sharing economy lies in breaking the principle of "everything requires ownership" and embracing "not ownership but usage." (Xinhua News Agency)

Shielding Case

heat shielding films SC80001,emi shielding gasket SC80001,EMI shielding materials SC80001

Wenzhou Hesheng Electronic Co., Ltd. , https://www.heshengelec.com